<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 101 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12567</link>
    <description>Enhanced compensation from land acquisition could not be taxed in assessment year 1990-91 because the Tribunal found that the enhancement order was made on 10 October 1986 and the amount was received on 28 December 1988, outside the relevant previous year. On those unchallenged findings, the sum was not taxable either on accrual basis or on receipt basis, and no substantial question of law arose under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The addition was therefore not sustainable and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 101 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12567</link>
      <description>Enhanced compensation from land acquisition could not be taxed in assessment year 1990-91 because the Tribunal found that the enhancement order was made on 10 October 1986 and the amount was received on 28 December 1988, outside the relevant previous year. On those unchallenged findings, the sum was not taxable either on accrual basis or on receipt basis, and no substantial question of law arose under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The addition was therefore not sustainable and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>