<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 121 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358010</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2005-06 to 2007-08 and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals. For assessment years 2008-09 to 2011-12, issues regarding credit entries in bank accounts and deemed dividend were remanded to the Ld. CIT-(A) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal stressed compliance with procedural rules and the importance of allowing adequate opportunities for evidence examination by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 121 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358010</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for assessment years 2005-06 to 2007-08 and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals. For assessment years 2008-09 to 2011-12, issues regarding credit entries in bank accounts and deemed dividend were remanded to the Ld. CIT-(A) for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal stressed compliance with procedural rules and the importance of allowing adequate opportunities for evidence examination by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>