https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358005 The High Court upheld the appointment of adjudicating authorities for show cause notices on service tax liability issued to cable operators in Amritsar. The Court ruled that the Deputy Commissioner had jurisdiction despite not being a Commissioner of Central Excise as required by a 2007 notification. Additionally, the Court affirmed the validity of orders dated 16.09.2015 and 08.12.2016, rejecting challenges based on a Master Circular's clauses regarding consolidation of similar notices. The Court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the petitioners to pursue a statutory appeal against the order dated 08.12.2016. en-us Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358005 The High Court upheld the appointment of adjudicating authorities for show cause notices on service tax liability issued to cable operators in Amritsar. The Court ruled that the Deputy Commissioner had jurisdiction despite not being a Commissioner of Central Excise as required by a 2007 notification. Additionally, the Court affirmed the validity of orders dated 16.09.2015 and 08.12.2016, rejecting challenges based on a Master Circular's clauses regarding consolidation of similar notices. The Court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the petitioners to pursue a statutory appeal against the order dated 08.12.2016. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358005