<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 112 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise &amp; Service Tax (Appeals), Noida. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, which found the respondent&#039;s refund claim of Rs. 21,31,73,004/- under Notification No.40/2012-ST to be valid, as the requirements were met. The revenue&#039;s arguments regarding non-compliance with Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994, were previously adjudicated and found tenable by the Commissioner. The Tribunal concluded that the revenue failed to provide sufficient grounds to overturn the Commissioner&#039;s findings, thereby affirming the refund&#039;s admissibility and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 112 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise &amp; Service Tax (Appeals), Noida. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, which found the respondent&#039;s refund claim of Rs. 21,31,73,004/- under Notification No.40/2012-ST to be valid, as the requirements were met. The revenue&#039;s arguments regarding non-compliance with Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994, were previously adjudicated and found tenable by the Commissioner. The Tribunal concluded that the revenue failed to provide sufficient grounds to overturn the Commissioner&#039;s findings, thereby affirming the refund&#039;s admissibility and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=358001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>