<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 102 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of CENVAT credit on Xerox copies of courier Bill of Entry, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appellant successfully argued that courier bills of entry are accepted documents for CENVAT credit under Rule 9 of CCR, citing binding judicial precedents and Tribunal decisions supporting their position. The Tribunal found the issue covered by the cited decisions and allowed the appeals, overturning the Commissioner(Appeals) order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 06:37:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 102 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of CENVAT credit on Xerox copies of courier Bill of Entry, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appellant successfully argued that courier bills of entry are accepted documents for CENVAT credit under Rule 9 of CCR, citing binding judicial precedents and Tribunal decisions supporting their position. The Tribunal found the issue covered by the cited decisions and allowed the appeals, overturning the Commissioner(Appeals) order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>