https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200538 Section 11(2) of the COFEPOSA Act permits a fresh detention order only where the earlier detention has been revoked within the statutory scheme, not where it has been quashed by the High Court in writ jurisdiction. Section 11(1) preserves revocation or modification power and aligns "revocation" with cancellation by the competent authority under the Act or section 21 of the General Clauses Act. Judicial quashing under Article 226 is materially different from statutory revocation because it nullifies the order through judicial review rather than rescission by the detaining authority. On that construction, a new detention order could not validly follow the earlier writ quashing. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:28:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200538 Section 11(2) of the COFEPOSA Act permits a fresh detention order only where the earlier detention has been revoked within the statutory scheme, not where it has been quashed by the High Court in writ jurisdiction. Section 11(1) preserves revocation or modification power and aligns "revocation" with cancellation by the competent authority under the Act or section 21 of the General Clauses Act. Judicial quashing under Article 226 is materially different from statutory revocation because it nullifies the order through judicial review rather than rescission by the detaining authority. On that construction, a new detention order could not validly follow the earlier writ quashing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200538