<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1061 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision allowing the builder/developer to use the project completion method for assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s consistent application of this method in previous years and noted that the projects in question were incomplete during the relevant assessment period. The decision reaffirmed that an assessee can choose a recognized accounting method if consistently followed, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s argument in favor of the percentage completion method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 17:51:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1061 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision allowing the builder/developer to use the project completion method for assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s consistent application of this method in previous years and noted that the projects in question were incomplete during the relevant assessment period. The decision reaffirmed that an assessee can choose a recognized accounting method if consistently followed, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s argument in favor of the percentage completion method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>