<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 25 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12559</link>
    <description>A prima facie adjustment under section 143(1)(a) based on the disallowance of prospecting licence charges raised a question of law, so the Tribunal erred in treating the matter as confined to fact and refusing reference. The question was therefore referable, and the assessee succeeded on that issue. Guest-house maintenance expenses, however, were treated as prima facie inadmissible under the Income-tax Act because of the specific statutory provision governing such expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:48:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 25 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12559</link>
      <description>A prima facie adjustment under section 143(1)(a) based on the disallowance of prospecting licence charges raised a question of law, so the Tribunal erred in treating the matter as confined to fact and refusing reference. The question was therefore referable, and the assessee succeeded on that issue. Guest-house maintenance expenses, however, were treated as prima facie inadmissible under the Income-tax Act because of the specific statutory provision governing such expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>