<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 616 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200534</link>
    <description>A writ court must confine a constitutional challenge to the provisions actually in issue; the High Court&#039;s blanket invalidation of the Karnataka Inams Abolition (Amendment) Act, 1979 was therefore too wide and sustainable only as to the provisions concerning religious and charitable inams. Orders made by the competent tribunal during the period when the amendment was treated as invalid were protected by the de facto doctrine, and settled positions were preserved to avoid unsettling matters already decided. Jurisdiction over matters governed by the personal inam legislation was restored to the Land Tribunal for future and pending cases, with challenges to vires left open in an appropriate proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:18:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 616 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200534</link>
      <description>A writ court must confine a constitutional challenge to the provisions actually in issue; the High Court&#039;s blanket invalidation of the Karnataka Inams Abolition (Amendment) Act, 1979 was therefore too wide and sustainable only as to the provisions concerning religious and charitable inams. Orders made by the competent tribunal during the period when the amendment was treated as invalid were protected by the de facto doctrine, and settled positions were preserved to avoid unsettling matters already decided. Jurisdiction over matters governed by the personal inam legislation was restored to the Land Tribunal for future and pending cases, with challenges to vires left open in an appropriate proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>