https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200533 The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner based on clause 9 of the Scheme of Amalgamation. The petitioners are required to provide a computerized printout of the Scheme and Schedule of assets to the department. Despite the Central Government's objection, the applicants must pay costs to the Central Government. Case CP No.150 of 2008 is disposed of, and all parties are instructed to act on a signed xerox copy of the order. en-us Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200533 The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner based on clause 9 of the Scheme of Amalgamation. The petitioners are required to provide a computerized printout of the Scheme and Schedule of assets to the department. Despite the Central Government's objection, the applicants must pay costs to the Central Government. Case CP No.150 of 2008 is disposed of, and all parties are instructed to act on a signed xerox copy of the order. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200533