https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357974 The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s findings on the legitimacy of agricultural income and other sources claimed. The undisclosed income was reduced from Rs. 14,97,51,700 to Rs. 1,29,52,434. The ITAT upheld additions related to unexplained deposits but directed the deletion of income from Teh Bazari and rent, stating it belonged to the HUF. The final order was issued on 23/03/2018. en-us Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Apr 2018 06:57:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357974 The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partly allowed the assessee's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s findings on the legitimacy of agricultural income and other sources claimed. The undisclosed income was reduced from Rs. 14,97,51,700 to Rs. 1,29,52,434. The ITAT upheld additions related to unexplained deposits but directed the deletion of income from Teh Bazari and rent, stating it belonged to the HUF. The final order was issued on 23/03/2018. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357974