<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 82 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357971</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with adjustments made to the list of comparables and directions given to allow depreciation on software. The Tribunal stressed functional comparability and adherence to prescribed rules for transfer pricing analysis, emphasizing the importance of appropriate comparables and methodologies in determining arm&#039;s length prices for international transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 08:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 82 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357971</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with adjustments made to the list of comparables and directions given to allow depreciation on software. The Tribunal stressed functional comparability and adherence to prescribed rules for transfer pricing analysis, emphasizing the importance of appropriate comparables and methodologies in determining arm&#039;s length prices for international transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>