<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 62 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357951</link>
    <description>The appeal arose from an Order-in-Original confirming duty demand and penalties on the appellant for clandestine activities. Penalties on the authorized signatory and confiscation of goods were upheld. The legal heir&#039;s liability for Central Excise dues was discussed, with the Tribunal holding that recovery from legal heirs is not automatic unless they continue the deceased&#039;s business. As the legal heir was not continuing the business, recovery proceedings against them were deemed unjustified. The Department was directed to recover dues from the deceased&#039;s assets, and the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 06:56:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 62 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357951</link>
      <description>The appeal arose from an Order-in-Original confirming duty demand and penalties on the appellant for clandestine activities. Penalties on the authorized signatory and confiscation of goods were upheld. The legal heir&#039;s liability for Central Excise dues was discussed, with the Tribunal holding that recovery from legal heirs is not automatic unless they continue the deceased&#039;s business. As the legal heir was not continuing the business, recovery proceedings against them were deemed unjustified. The Department was directed to recover dues from the deceased&#039;s assets, and the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>