<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 54 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357943</link>
    <description>Printed sheets, leaflets and similar goods manufactured on job-work basis were treated as classifiable under Chapter 49 rather than Chapter 48 because the tariff entry and departmental clarification indicated that products deriving their identity and utility from printing fall within Chapter 49. The Tribunal also relied on the fact that the same goods had already been classified under Chapter 49 in the assessee&#039;s own case, and found no basis to depart from that view. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the classification was therefore rejected, and the appellate order upholding Chapter 49 classification was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 54 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357943</link>
      <description>Printed sheets, leaflets and similar goods manufactured on job-work basis were treated as classifiable under Chapter 49 rather than Chapter 48 because the tariff entry and departmental clarification indicated that products deriving their identity and utility from printing fall within Chapter 49. The Tribunal also relied on the fact that the same goods had already been classified under Chapter 49 in the assessee&#039;s own case, and found no basis to depart from that view. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the classification was therefore rejected, and the appellate order upholding Chapter 49 classification was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>