<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1568 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200521</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chandigarh dismissed the departmental appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under Long Term Capital Gain. The judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court in a similar case was pivotal, and the pendency of a departmental appeal before the Supreme Court did not affect the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 06:43:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1568 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200521</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chandigarh dismissed the departmental appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under Long Term Capital Gain. The judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court in a similar case was pivotal, and the pendency of a departmental appeal before the Supreme Court did not affect the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>