<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s Payment Not FTS: IPR Retained by Non-Resident Supplier; No Business Exploitation of Design &amp; Development.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38713</link>
    <description>Fees for technical services (FTS) - nature of payment - the assessee was not exploiting the D&amp;D for business purposes, that IPR of the D&amp;D were retained by the non resident supplier - disputed amount cannot be considered as FTS - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 15:37:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 15:37:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s Payment Not FTS: IPR Retained by Non-Resident Supplier; No Business Exploitation of Design &amp; Development.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38713</link>
      <description>Fees for technical services (FTS) - nature of payment - the assessee was not exploiting the D&amp;D for business purposes, that IPR of the D&amp;D were retained by the non resident supplier - disputed amount cannot be considered as FTS - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 15:37:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>