<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 103 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12543</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the arbitrary valuation of the property and upholding the right to full exemption under the proviso to section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court emphasized that Assessing Officers cannot impose subjective limits on open space around a house or determine the optimal size of a property for wealth tax assessment, safeguarding taxpayers&#039; entitlement to statutory exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:54:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 103 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12543</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the arbitrary valuation of the property and upholding the right to full exemption under the proviso to section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court emphasized that Assessing Officers cannot impose subjective limits on open space around a house or determine the optimal size of a property for wealth tax assessment, safeguarding taxpayers&#039; entitlement to statutory exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>