<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 30 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357919</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider certain issues. The Tribunal accepted the exclusion of specific comparable companies due to various factors such as employee cost ratio, turnover, brand value, and profitability impact. The Tribunal also directed the computation of working capital adjusted operating margins based on OECD guidelines. Issues deemed academic did not require separate adjudication, and the proposal to levy penalties and interest was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 30 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357919</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider certain issues. The Tribunal accepted the exclusion of specific comparable companies due to various factors such as employee cost ratio, turnover, brand value, and profitability impact. The Tribunal also directed the computation of working capital adjusted operating margins based on OECD guidelines. Issues deemed academic did not require separate adjudication, and the proposal to levy penalties and interest was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>