<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 29 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357918</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, overturning the disallowance of depreciation on software purchase under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal held that the disallowance was unjustified for capitalized assets, citing the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court and clarifying that section 40(a)(ia) does not apply to expenses capitalized without a legal obligation for tax deduction at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 08:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 29 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357918</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, overturning the disallowance of depreciation on software purchase under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11. The Tribunal held that the disallowance was unjustified for capitalized assets, citing the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court and clarifying that section 40(a)(ia) does not apply to expenses capitalized without a legal obligation for tax deduction at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>