https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357915 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of the refund claim under the CENVAT Credit Rules. It emphasized the appellant's compliance with export service conditions and principles of natural justice. The Tribunal found that the original order lacked such compliance and ruled in favor of the appellant, noting that the appellant met all conditions for service export as per Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules. Referring to a Board circular and Notification No.5/2006, the Tribunal set aside the rejection order, granting the appellant the CENVAT credit refund without restrictions on credit timing. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Apr 2018 08:34:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357915 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the rejection of the refund claim under the CENVAT Credit Rules. It emphasized the appellant's compliance with export service conditions and principles of natural justice. The Tribunal found that the original order lacked such compliance and ruled in favor of the appellant, noting that the appellant met all conditions for service export as per Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules. Referring to a Board circular and Notification No.5/2006, the Tribunal set aside the rejection order, granting the appellant the CENVAT credit refund without restrictions on credit timing. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357915