https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357913 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the VCES application due to the appellant's failure to comply with the payment deadline set by the scheme. The appellant's argument for an extension of time based on financial difficulties was dismissed as the VCES did not allow for such extensions beyond the specified deadline. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory time limits, the Tribunal affirmed the decision, highlighting the distinction between genuine delays and deliberate non-compliance. The appeal was dismissed, underscoring the significance of timely compliance with VCES provisions. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357913 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the VCES application due to the appellant's failure to comply with the payment deadline set by the scheme. The appellant's argument for an extension of time based on financial difficulties was dismissed as the VCES did not allow for such extensions beyond the specified deadline. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory time limits, the Tribunal affirmed the decision, highlighting the distinction between genuine delays and deliberate non-compliance. The appeal was dismissed, underscoring the significance of timely compliance with VCES provisions. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357913