<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 18 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357907</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1.70 Crores made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the legitimacy of the transactions, while the AO failed to provide evidence to the contrary. Relying on established legal principles, the tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 08:18:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 18 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357907</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1.70 Crores made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the legitimacy of the transactions, while the AO failed to provide evidence to the contrary. Relying on established legal principles, the tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>