<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 15 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, finding the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) unsustainable due to defective notices issued under section 274 that did not specify the charge. Emphasizing the importance of clear and specific penalty notices for statutory compliance and natural justice principles, the Tribunal dismissed the stay application as infructuous post the appeal allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2018 08:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 15 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees, finding the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) unsustainable due to defective notices issued under section 274 that did not specify the charge. Emphasizing the importance of clear and specific penalty notices for statutory compliance and natural justice principles, the Tribunal dismissed the stay application as infructuous post the appeal allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>