<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 12 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357901</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow additional expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, emphasizing the AO&#039;s lack of objective assessment before invoking Rule 8D. The ITAT also supported treating software expenses related to the website/portal as revenue expenditure, in line with judicial precedents. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 08:18:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 12 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357901</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow additional expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, emphasizing the AO&#039;s lack of objective assessment before invoking Rule 8D. The ITAT also supported treating software expenses related to the website/portal as revenue expenditure, in line with judicial precedents. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>