<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 11 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the disallowance of Rs. 3,00,00,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act related to the sale of shares. The Tribunal found that the assessee had satisfied the conditions for most transactions and provided necessary details. Additionally, the disallowance of revenue expenditure amounting to Rs. 43,852/- was reversed by the Tribunal, citing the necessity for a private limited company to incur certain expenses even if not actively conducting business activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 11 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the disallowance of Rs. 3,00,00,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act related to the sale of shares. The Tribunal found that the assessee had satisfied the conditions for most transactions and provided necessary details. Additionally, the disallowance of revenue expenditure amounting to Rs. 43,852/- was reversed by the Tribunal, citing the necessity for a private limited company to incur certain expenses even if not actively conducting business activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>