<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 9 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to use the average GP rate of past years for income computation. The addition of Rs. 9,40,000 under section 68 for unexplained credit was upheld due to the assessee&#039;s failure to prove the genuineness of the transaction. The disallowance of expenses was dismissed as the assessee did not press the ground during the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 08:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 9 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to use the average GP rate of past years for income computation. The addition of Rs. 9,40,000 under section 68 for unexplained credit was upheld due to the assessee&#039;s failure to prove the genuineness of the transaction. The disallowance of expenses was dismissed as the assessee did not press the ground during the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>