<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 7 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357896</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the reopening of assessment based on incriminating material indicating the assessee&#039;s involvement in bogus purchase entries. However, the addition on account of bogus purchases was rejected due to lack of evidence supporting the genuineness of the transactions. The decision aligned with legal precedents and principles, resulting in the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 08:18:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 7 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357896</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the reopening of assessment based on incriminating material indicating the assessee&#039;s involvement in bogus purchase entries. However, the addition on account of bogus purchases was rejected due to lack of evidence supporting the genuineness of the transactions. The decision aligned with legal precedents and principles, resulting in the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>