https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357892 An order framing charge under the Prevention of Corruption Act is not purely interlocutory, so it may be examined in exceptional cases of patent illegality, abuse of process, or lack of jurisdiction. Section 19(3)(c) does not create an absolute bar on the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC or its constitutional jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227, although that power must be used sparingly and only in rare cases to prevent grave injustice. Any stay of proceedings must be supported by a speaking order and should not defeat the legislative policy of speedy trial in corruption prosecutions. en-us Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357892 An order framing charge under the Prevention of Corruption Act is not purely interlocutory, so it may be examined in exceptional cases of patent illegality, abuse of process, or lack of jurisdiction. Section 19(3)(c) does not create an absolute bar on the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC or its constitutional jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227, although that power must be used sparingly and only in rare cases to prevent grave injustice. Any stay of proceedings must be supported by a speaking order and should not defeat the legislative policy of speedy trial in corruption prosecutions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357892