<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 646 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200508</link>
    <description>The ITAT canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) despite the assessee revising the return and disclosing income before the notice under section 148 was issued. The ITAT found the penalty was solely based on the revised income offered by the assessee voluntarily, vacating the lower authorities&#039; findings and partially allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:38:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 646 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200508</link>
      <description>The ITAT canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) despite the assessee revising the return and disclosing income before the notice under section 148 was issued. The ITAT found the penalty was solely based on the revised income offered by the assessee voluntarily, vacating the lower authorities&#039; findings and partially allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>