<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1174 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200507</link>
    <description>The appeal involved the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the computation of deduction under section 80-IB. The CIT (A) upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to exclude unabsorbed depreciation while computing the allowable deduction, following a Supreme Court judgment. The CIT (A) dismissed the challenge to the reopening and affirmed the treatment of unabsorbed depreciation. On the computation of deduction under section 80-IB, the Tribunal ruled that profits of the eligible unit should not be reduced by setting off losses or unabsorbed depreciation, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:23:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1174 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200507</link>
      <description>The appeal involved the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the computation of deduction under section 80-IB. The CIT (A) upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to exclude unabsorbed depreciation while computing the allowable deduction, following a Supreme Court judgment. The CIT (A) dismissed the challenge to the reopening and affirmed the treatment of unabsorbed depreciation. On the computation of deduction under section 80-IB, the Tribunal ruled that profits of the eligible unit should not be reduced by setting off losses or unabsorbed depreciation, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>