<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules CIT Wrong in Penalizing Without AO&#039;s Satisfaction u/ss 271(1)(c) and 263 of Income Tax Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38697</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - revision u/s 263 - In the absence of any finding of the AO with regard to concealment of income or with regard to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, the CIT clearly erred in holding that omission to record satisfaction to initiate penalty proceedings was erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:00:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:00:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules CIT Wrong in Penalizing Without AO&#039;s Satisfaction u/ss 271(1)(c) and 263 of Income Tax Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38697</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - revision u/s 263 - In the absence of any finding of the AO with regard to concealment of income or with regard to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, the CIT clearly erred in holding that omission to record satisfaction to initiate penalty proceedings was erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:00:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>