<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1592 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357889</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessee had established the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of its shareholders. The Court ruled that the proviso to Section 68 of the Income Tax Act did not apply to the share application money received in the relevant assessment year, as it was introduced after that period. The appeal was dismissed without costs, as the issue had been settled in a prior decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 07:20:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1592 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357889</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessee had established the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of its shareholders. The Court ruled that the proviso to Section 68 of the Income Tax Act did not apply to the share application money received in the relevant assessment year, as it was introduced after that period. The appeal was dismissed without costs, as the issue had been settled in a prior decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>