<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1584 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals for statistical purposes, directing the AO to verify the facts and circumstances related to revenue recognition method and penalty imposition. The AO was instructed to ensure consistency in accounting methods, prevent double taxation, and establish the genuineness of the assessee&#039;s explanations regarding inaccurate income particulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 20:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1584 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals for statistical purposes, directing the AO to verify the facts and circumstances related to revenue recognition method and penalty imposition. The AO was instructed to ensure consistency in accounting methods, prevent double taxation, and establish the genuineness of the assessee&#039;s explanations regarding inaccurate income particulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>