<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1579 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357876</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that the addition of Rs. 2,35,90,226 under Section 68 was not sustainable. The Tribunal found the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the creditor were adequately proven through documentary evidence and statements. The Tribunal highlighted the audited accounts and genuine trading results, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 07:19:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1579 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357876</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that the addition of Rs. 2,35,90,226 under Section 68 was not sustainable. The Tribunal found the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the creditor were adequately proven through documentary evidence and statements. The Tribunal highlighted the audited accounts and genuine trading results, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>