<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1573 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357870</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, determining that the income declared was voluntary, the revised returns were valid, and the receipts could not be treated as unexplained investments. The disallowance of professional charges was upheld, and the interest levy was partially allowed. Penalties under section 271(1)(c) were deleted as the income declared was voluntary and not a case of concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2018 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1573 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357870</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, determining that the income declared was voluntary, the revised returns were valid, and the receipts could not be treated as unexplained investments. The disallowance of professional charges was upheld, and the interest levy was partially allowed. Penalties under section 271(1)(c) were deleted as the income declared was voluntary and not a case of concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>