<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1568 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357865</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes, indicating the need for further examination by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying the actual impact of the supplementary agreement on the rental income received by the assessee, highlighting the necessity for a comprehensive review based on all relevant documents and agreements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2018 07:19:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1568 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357865</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes, indicating the need for further examination by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying the actual impact of the supplementary agreement on the rental income received by the assessee, highlighting the necessity for a comprehensive review based on all relevant documents and agreements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>