<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 34 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12530</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court clarified that a &quot;regular assessment&quot; under the Income-tax Act refers to the first assessment under section 143 or 144, excluding subsequent modified assessments. The insertion of Explanation 2 expanded this definition to include assessments under section 147. In a case where a reassessment under section 147 followed an initial assessment under section 143(1), the court held it did not qualify as a regular assessment. Interest levied during reassessment was canceled as it was deemed unjustified. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s petition, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between initial assessments and reassessments for interest charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:30:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 34 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12530</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court clarified that a &quot;regular assessment&quot; under the Income-tax Act refers to the first assessment under section 143 or 144, excluding subsequent modified assessments. The insertion of Explanation 2 expanded this definition to include assessments under section 147. In a case where a reassessment under section 147 followed an initial assessment under section 143(1), the court held it did not qualify as a regular assessment. Interest levied during reassessment was canceled as it was deemed unjustified. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s petition, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between initial assessments and reassessments for interest charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>