<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1558 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357855</link>
    <description>Provisional release conditions for seized imported goods were modified where the importer offered revenue security and was a regular importer, and where demurrage had become disproportionate to the value of the goods and duty involved. The Tribunal held that requiring deposit of the entire duty at that stage was not justified. The importer was directed to deposit 30% of the duty in cash and execute a bond for the balance, and the goods were to be provisionally released.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2019 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1558 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357855</link>
      <description>Provisional release conditions for seized imported goods were modified where the importer offered revenue security and was a regular importer, and where demurrage had become disproportionate to the value of the goods and duty involved. The Tribunal held that requiring deposit of the entire duty at that stage was not justified. The importer was directed to deposit 30% of the duty in cash and execute a bond for the balance, and the goods were to be provisionally released.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>