<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1921 (8) TMI 2 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200496</link>
    <description>Attachment of property in criminal process places it in legal custody and interrupts adverse possession, so limitation does not run against the true owner during the attachment period. A rent decree will not be treated as invalid merely because certain interested persons were imperfectly represented where they had notice of the proceedings, were substantially represented, or no legal defect in the guardian arrangement is shown. Allegations that family-created tenancies were fictitious depend on proof of actual possession, cultivation, and enjoyment; suspicion from low rent or family links is insufficient. An appellate challenge to the identity of land will not ordinarily be reopened without prompt correction of the record and reliable proof of error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:03:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1921 (8) TMI 2 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200496</link>
      <description>Attachment of property in criminal process places it in legal custody and interrupts adverse possession, so limitation does not run against the true owner during the attachment period. A rent decree will not be treated as invalid merely because certain interested persons were imperfectly represented where they had notice of the proceedings, were substantially represented, or no legal defect in the guardian arrangement is shown. Allegations that family-created tenancies were fictitious depend on proof of actual possession, cultivation, and enjoyment; suspicion from low rent or family links is insufficient. An appellate challenge to the identity of land will not ordinarily be reopened without prompt correction of the record and reliable proof of error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>