https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200491 In a statutorily restricted second appeal, the High Court could interfere only on the legal grounds expressly permitted by the governing tenancy law and civil procedure, not by reappraising evidence on factual matters. The dispute before the lower appellate court concerned the character and measurement of the lands, which were essentially questions of fact. By substituting its own view of the evidence without identifying a qualifying legal or jurisdictional error, the High Court exceeded its authority. The District Judge's decree was therefore restored and the High Court's decrees were set aside. en-us Tue, 04 Jun 1918 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Mar 2018 14:38:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200491 In a statutorily restricted second appeal, the High Court could interfere only on the legal grounds expressly permitted by the governing tenancy law and civil procedure, not by reappraising evidence on factual matters. The dispute before the lower appellate court concerned the character and measurement of the lands, which were essentially questions of fact. By substituting its own view of the evidence without identifying a qualifying legal or jurisdictional error, the High Court exceeded its authority. The District Judge's decree was therefore restored and the High Court's decrees were set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Jun 1918 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200491