https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200488 The court confirmed the second defendant firm as the agent of the first defendant firm, exempting it from damages but holding it liable for refunding monies paid by the plaintiff. The first defendant firm was found liable for additional claims by the plaintiff, including interest and expenses. The plaintiff was granted a decree of Rs. 4,126 against the second defendant firm and Rs. 5,219 against the first defendant firm, along with costs. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Mar 2018 12:03:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200488 The court confirmed the second defendant firm as the agent of the first defendant firm, exempting it from damages but holding it liable for refunding monies paid by the plaintiff. The first defendant firm was found liable for additional claims by the plaintiff, including interest and expenses. The plaintiff was granted a decree of Rs. 4,126 against the second defendant firm and Rs. 5,219 against the first defendant firm, along with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200488