<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1528 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357825</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the recipient-shareholder is liable to tax for deemed dividends received, as exemptions under Section 10(34) only apply to amounts taxed under Section 115(O). The appeal was rejected, with no costs awarded, clarifying the tax implications of deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1528 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357825</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the recipient-shareholder is liable to tax for deemed dividends received, as exemptions under Section 10(34) only apply to amounts taxed under Section 115(O). The appeal was rejected, with no costs awarded, clarifying the tax implications of deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>