<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1515 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO under section 41(1) of the IT Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the mere long-standing nature of liabilities does not imply cessation, and the AO failed to provide evidence of cessation or remission of liabilities. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on several precedents that support the view that liabilities shown in the books and not written off cannot be treated as income under section 41(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 08:19:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1515 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the AO under section 41(1) of the IT Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the mere long-standing nature of liabilities does not imply cessation, and the AO failed to provide evidence of cessation or remission of liabilities. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on several precedents that support the view that liabilities shown in the books and not written off cannot be treated as income under section 41(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>