https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357802 The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority's findings on the imposition of Countervailing duty on certain steel products from China. It determined that the distinction between hot rolled (HR) and cold rolled (CR) steel products was valid, and the imposition of both Anti-Dumping (AD) and Countervailing (CV) duties on the same goods was legal. The Tribunal found that the duties imposed did not exceed the injury margin and that the Lesser Duty Rule was appropriately applied. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the miscellaneous application was disposed of. en-us Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357802 The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority's findings on the imposition of Countervailing duty on certain steel products from China. It determined that the distinction between hot rolled (HR) and cold rolled (CR) steel products was valid, and the imposition of both Anti-Dumping (AD) and Countervailing (CV) duties on the same goods was legal. The Tribunal found that the duties imposed did not exceed the injury margin and that the Lesser Duty Rule was appropriately applied. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the miscellaneous application was disposed of. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357802