https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357793 Under Article 2(b) of the Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920, limitation for a suit for possession starts when the declaratory decree is actually drawn and obtained, not merely when the declaratory judgment is pronounced. On that construction, a suit filed within three years of the prepared decree was in time. The Court also held that Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applied to exclude time spent in bona fide execution proceedings that failed because the relief could not be granted in that forum, since the special limitation law did not expressly exclude Sections 4 to 25 and Section 29(2) preserved their application. The High Court's view on limitation was set aside and the plaintiff's decree restored. en-us Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357793 Under Article 2(b) of the Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920, limitation for a suit for possession starts when the declaratory decree is actually drawn and obtained, not merely when the declaratory judgment is pronounced. On that construction, a suit filed within three years of the prepared decree was in time. The Court also held that Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applied to exclude time spent in bona fide execution proceedings that failed because the relief could not be granted in that forum, since the special limitation law did not expressly exclude Sections 4 to 25 and Section 29(2) preserved their application. The High Court's view on limitation was set aside and the plaintiff's decree restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357793