<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1495 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357792</link>
    <description>The constitutional guarantee of speedy justice under Articles 14 and 21 was linked to chronic delay in criminal appeals, leading to a call for structural reform, including possible alternative fora to decongest High Courts. Judicial vacancies and appointment delays were treated as serious impediments to effective justice delivery, prompting support for timelier selection processes, stronger candidate evaluation, and administrative reforms consistent with judicial independence. Repeated strikes and abstention by advocates were held to obstruct access to justice and waste judicial time, with reporting and monitoring measures proposed and contempt or inherent jurisdiction left open for further action. The appeal was disposed of with systemic directions and no bail relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1495 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357792</link>
      <description>The constitutional guarantee of speedy justice under Articles 14 and 21 was linked to chronic delay in criminal appeals, leading to a call for structural reform, including possible alternative fora to decongest High Courts. Judicial vacancies and appointment delays were treated as serious impediments to effective justice delivery, prompting support for timelier selection processes, stronger candidate evaluation, and administrative reforms consistent with judicial independence. Repeated strikes and abstention by advocates were held to obstruct access to justice and waste judicial time, with reporting and monitoring measures proposed and contempt or inherent jurisdiction left open for further action. The appeal was disposed of with systemic directions and no bail relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>