<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1488 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357785</link>
    <description>Credit on welding electrodes used for repairs, maintenance and installation of machinery under the Cenvat regime cannot be denied merely because they are not directly consumed in manufacture. The governing test is whether the goods are used directly or indirectly in manufacture, or in a process so integrally connected with production that manufacture would be commercially inexpedient without it. The earlier Tribunal approach was incomplete because it relied only on precedent and did not examine the factual nexus between the electrodes and the manufacturing process. The credit claim therefore required fresh factual reconsideration rather than rejection on the basis of the earlier view alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1488 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357785</link>
      <description>Credit on welding electrodes used for repairs, maintenance and installation of machinery under the Cenvat regime cannot be denied merely because they are not directly consumed in manufacture. The governing test is whether the goods are used directly or indirectly in manufacture, or in a process so integrally connected with production that manufacture would be commercially inexpedient without it. The earlier Tribunal approach was incomplete because it relied only on precedent and did not examine the factual nexus between the electrodes and the manufacturing process. The credit claim therefore required fresh factual reconsideration rather than rejection on the basis of the earlier view alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>