<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1487 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357784</link>
    <description>Classification of Keshyog Ayurvedic/Herbal Hair Oil and Keshyog Ayurvedic Shampoo depended on their true character, assessed from ingredients, label, literature and commercial understanding; because the material showed therapeutic character, Chapter 30 as Ayurvedic medicine prevailed over Chapter 33 as a cosmetic or toilet preparation. The goods received in bulk were then labelled, repacked into retail packs and made fit for sale; that post-receipt activity fell within the relevant chapter note deeming such processes to be manufacture. The goods remained classifiable under Chapter 30, but the processing was still treated as manufacture for excise purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1487 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357784</link>
      <description>Classification of Keshyog Ayurvedic/Herbal Hair Oil and Keshyog Ayurvedic Shampoo depended on their true character, assessed from ingredients, label, literature and commercial understanding; because the material showed therapeutic character, Chapter 30 as Ayurvedic medicine prevailed over Chapter 33 as a cosmetic or toilet preparation. The goods received in bulk were then labelled, repacked into retail packs and made fit for sale; that post-receipt activity fell within the relevant chapter note deeming such processes to be manufacture. The goods remained classifiable under Chapter 30, but the processing was still treated as manufacture for excise purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>