<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1482 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357779</link>
    <description>Finality of the admissibility of Cenvat credit on welding electrodes barred reopening the same issue to sustain penalties. The Tribunal noted that the credit dispute had already been decided in favour of admissibility, and the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the civil appeal brought that determination to finality. Applying the doctrine of merger, the earlier finding could not be re-agitated for penalty purposes. The order setting aside the penalties was therefore maintained, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 19:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1482 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357779</link>
      <description>Finality of the admissibility of Cenvat credit on welding electrodes barred reopening the same issue to sustain penalties. The Tribunal noted that the credit dispute had already been decided in favour of admissibility, and the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the civil appeal brought that determination to finality. Applying the doctrine of merger, the earlier finding could not be re-agitated for penalty purposes. The order setting aside the penalties was therefore maintained, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>