<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 94 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12514</link>
    <description>A dominant issue was whether an order transferring assessment proceedings under s.127 was vitiated for breach of natural justice and statutory mandate. The HC held that a s.127 show-cause notice should disclose reasons enabling effective objections, though non-disclosure may be waived and is not fatal absent prejudice; here, the assessee&#039;s objections meant no interference solely on that ground. However, the transfer order was held unlawful because it failed to consider the objections, showing non-application of mind, and the recorded reasons lacked a relevant financial nexus to justify transfer under s.127(1). The writ petition was allowed and the transfer order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:42:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 94 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12514</link>
      <description>A dominant issue was whether an order transferring assessment proceedings under s.127 was vitiated for breach of natural justice and statutory mandate. The HC held that a s.127 show-cause notice should disclose reasons enabling effective objections, though non-disclosure may be waived and is not fatal absent prejudice; here, the assessee&#039;s objections meant no interference solely on that ground. However, the transfer order was held unlawful because it failed to consider the objections, showing non-application of mind, and the recorded reasons lacked a relevant financial nexus to justify transfer under s.127(1). The writ petition was allowed and the transfer order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>